lying in ponds
The absurdity of partisanship
Home | About | Philosophy | Methods | Contact | FAQ | 2002 | 2003

Pundit Boxscore for Thursday 27 January 2005

Lines in yellow indicate a substantive crossover column, meaning that the column is of opposite sign to the pundit's Normalized Total PI for the season, and contains at least five non-neutral partisan references.
Lines in gray indicate that the pundit has been classified as inactive, meaning that their columns are not currently being evaluated for partisanship.
Democratic references in blue, Republican in red, positive references in bold, negative in italics.
Author/
Affiliation
Title/
Date
words PI Partisan References
George F. Will
Washington Post
Harvard Hysterics
27 January 2005
886 100 1R+
Hopkins's hysteria: President Bush
David S. Broder
Washington Post
To Thompson, Lots More to Do
27 January 2005
893 81 1D=,13R+,2R=
To Thompson,: Thompson
No secretary: Tommy Thompson
When I: Thompson, Mike Leavitt
Thompson, who: Thompson
It frustrates: Thompson, Democratic, Bush
On health: Thompson
He recommends: Thompson
But health: the president
Thompson's own: Thompson
Expanding government: Thompson
Thompson leaves: Thompson
"It can: Thompson
As he: Tommy Thompson
Maureen Dowd
New York Times
Love for Sale
27 January 2005
954 78 1D-,1R+,20R-,1R=
Mr. Williams: President Bush
Now we: Bush
Genius? Not: W., White House
I still: administration
I could: Alberto Gonzales, Condi Rice, vice president
My preference: Rummy, Rummy
What is: The president
Who can: Rummy
That's why: Rummy, Rummy, Rummy
I could: John McCain, Rummy, Rummy
The president: The president, Rice, Bush
And why: Robert McNamara, W.
Thomas Sowell
Creators Syndicate
Self-indulgence
27 January 2005
788 60 1D+,1D-,3R+
The enraged: President Bush
 That they: Republicans, Bill Clinton
 Are the: President Bush
 The irony: President Clinton
Molly Ivins
Creators Syndicate
Team Bush flip-flops on Social Security linguistics
27 January 2005
1009 58 3D=,14R-,7R=
Team Bush: Bush
01.27.05 -: administration
Here's the: the president, President Bush, administration, Republicans, Democrats
So the: Republicans, Republicans, the president, administration
Meanwhile, Karl: Karl Rove, Frank Luntz
Corrupting language: Republicans
Luntz himself: Luntz
Asked: "Do: Democrats, the president
Luntz: "I: Luntz, Democrats
"But wait,: the president
You see: the president, Nixon
Rove is: Rove
Although it's: Republicans
Ann Coulter
Universal Press Syndicate
Where's that religious fanatic we elected?
27 January 2005
1023 40 2D-,2D=,1R=
Maybe he: President Bush
Judging by: Hillary Clinton
Hillary went: Hillary
I've never: Hillary
If, right: Hillary Clinton
Peggy Noonan
WSJ OpinionJournal
A Sourpuss? Moi?
27 January 2005
2289 11 1D+,6R+,7R-,5R=
You know: the president
Am I: White House
Yes. My: Bill Bennett
True. But: The president
For a: Ronald Reagan, Reagan
But isn't: Bush
I am.: Reagan, White House, administration
As for: Bush, the president, Jack Kennedy
I had: White House, White House, Reagan White House
No. It: the president, Bush, Bush
Jim Hoagland
Inactive
Ukraine's Lesson for Putin
27 January 2005
867
Kathleen Parker
Tribune Media Services
The virtuous vs. SpongeBob
27 January 2005
823 0
Richard Cohen
Washington Post
Evil Too Great to Grasp -- or Remember
27 January 2005
825 0 1R=
Here is: the president
Thomas L. Friedman
Inactive
Read My Ears
27 January 2005
973
Jeff Jacoby
Boston Globe
A factory for death
27 January 2005
845 0