lying in ponds
The absurdity of partisanship
Home | About | Philosophy | Methods | Contact | FAQ | 2002 | 2003

Pundit Boxscore for Thursday 13 January 2005

INDEPENDENCE: Armstrong Williams is not on the Lying in Ponds roster, but David Corn reports that he said that there might be other pundits accepting money from the Bush administration without disclosure. If Mr. Williams had been on the roster, I would have dropped him, on the grounds that he could no longer even pretend to be independent. Several of our pundits have weighed in -- Clarence Page, Harold Meyerson, Kathleen Parker, Linda Chavez, Michelle Malkin, and George Will. I was particularly interested in something Ms. Parker said:

The deal was that Williams would devote some airtime to promoting the Bush administration's "No Child Left Behind" education-reform program on his syndicated television show and interview Education Department officials from time to time. The rub came when Williams also promoted the program in his syndicated column, which, given its play in the journalism arena, is perceived as an independent voice.

I've argued here that all of our political columnists claim to be independent, that truly independent voices from the left and right are vital, and that the excessive partisanship shown by the gorillas of shrillness at the top of the Lying in Ponds rankings amounts to advertising taking the place of journalism. A columnist could choose to sacrifice independence with or without accepting payment -- the money only helps to make the transformation easier to see.



Lines in yellow indicate a substantive crossover column, meaning that the column is of opposite sign to the pundit's Normalized Total PI for the season, and contains at least five non-neutral partisan references.
Lines in gray indicate that the pundit has been classified as inactive, meaning that their columns are not currently being evaluated for partisanship.
Democratic references in blue, Republican in red, positive references in bold, negative in italics.
Author/
Affiliation
Title/
Date
words PI Partisan References
David S. Broder
Washington Post
Shaping Our Defense
13 January 2005
869 92 11R+,1R=
The unusual: Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge
"For us: Ridge
No one,: Ridge
Donald Plusquellic,: Ridge
Ridge enjoyed: Ridge
That is: Ridge
A bigger: Ridge, Ridge
Making space: Ridge
"You can't: Ridge
As Ridge: Ridge, Michael Chertoff
Molly Ivins
Creators Syndicate
As a matter of fact
13 January 2005
972 85 1R+,12R-
01.13.05 -: president of the United States
Let's try: the president, the president
The memo: Karl Rove, administration
There's no: Bush administration, Bushies
Even the: administration, administration, Bush, Colin Powell
And now: administration, administration
Richard Cohen
Washington Post
Hollow Accountability
13 January 2005
941 81 1R+,18R-,2R=
It took: President Bush, administration, Bush
Let us: the president
Don Rumsfeld,: Don Rumsfeld
Condi Rice,: Condi Rice, the president
Vice President: Vice President Cheney
Bush's observation: Bush, Bush
Liars get: Bush
As others: Bush, The Reagans
Later, "60: Bush administration
Now it: Bush, GOP, White House, Republican National Committee, Ed Gillespie, President Bush, administration
Ann Coulter
Universal Press Syndicate
Liar, liar, now you're fired
13 January 2005
1654 66 8D-,2D=,14R+,3R-,2R=
If CNN: George Bush
Dan Rather: Kerry, Bill Clinton
Responding to: George Bush
If only: Bush
Admittedly, Juanita: Clinton, Bill Clinton, Bush, Clinton
Fortunately for: Bill Clinton, Bush
Among the: president
He blamed: Bush
He had: Bush, Democrats
He had: Bush
In exchange: Kerry
It seems: President Bush, Bush
Instead, Mapes: Republican, John McCain, the president
"Mapes told: Condi Rice
Mapes really: George Bush
Actually, Mapes: Republicans, Republican, Dick Thornburgh
If Fox: Kerry, Kerry
Robert Novak
Creators Syndicate
Social Security rubicon
13 January 2005
1032 34 8D+,8D-,15D=,23R+,1R-,10R=
WASHINGTON --: Republican, Lindsey Graham, Democrats
 Four Democratic: Democratic, Graham, Republican, Graham
 Crossing Graham's: Graham, Democrats, President Bush, Republican Party, Republicans
 The meeting: Graham, Graham, Chuck Grassley, Judd Gregg, Graham
 Gregg is: Gregg, Gregg, Democratic, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Bob Kerrey, Chuck Robb, John Breaux, Democrats, Bill Clinton
 Now, all: Democrats, Democrats, Graham, Joe Lieberman, Ben Nelson, Blanche Lincoln, Max Baucus, Bush, Nelson, White House
 The most: Baucus, Democrat, Bush
 Even more: Kent Conrad, Democrat, Conrad, Bush, Conrad, Graham
 Buying into: Graham, Democrat, Gene Sperling, Clinton administration, Graham, Sperling, Bush, Sperling
 Indeed, there: Republicans, Democrats, Graham, Sperling, Republican, GOP
 Many conservatives: Graham, George W. Bush, administration, Democrats, the president, Lindsey Graham
George F. Will
Washington Post
No Ad Left Behind
13 January 2005
871 20 3D-,1R+,6R-
Just 10: Republicans, Republicans, Republican president, Republican, President Bill Clinton
This scofflaw: Republican, Bush administration, administration
It is: Democrats, Democrats
Peggy Noonan
WSJ OpinionJournal
MSM Requiem
13 January 2005
1954 20 4R+,2R-,4R=
Is it: Bush
Finally, one: Bush
Of the: George Bush, Republican Party, Bush, GOP
Mr. Fineman: McCarthyism
But in: Rush Limbaugh, Reagan
You can: Trent Lott
Jim Hoagland
Inactive
No 'Owning' Iraq
13 January 2005
891
Maureen Dowd
New York Times
Men Just Want Mommy
13 January 2005
864 0
Jeff Jacoby
Boston Globe
A bigger, more democratic Congress
13 January 2005
887 0
Thomas L. Friedman
Inactive
Ballots and Boycotts
13 January 2005
913
Thomas Sowell
Creators Syndicate
I beg to disagree
13 January 2005
758 0