lying in ponds
The absurdity of partisanship
Home | About | Philosophy | Methods | Contact | FAQ | 2002 | 2003

Pundit Boxscore for Monday 19 April 2004

THE PUNDITS RESPOND: On Friday I e-mailed the note asking about their role to as many active Lying in Ponds pundits as I could find an address for. I skipped Paul Krugman, because he has already made it clear that he does not see himself as a partisan columnist. I've received three thoughtful responses so far. The last note is from Clarence Page (CP). Here they are in their entirety:


Columnists are people who are entitled to their own opinions but not to their own facts. So long as they get the facts right, it doesn't matter whether they are "partisan" or "independent," though personally I think the independent ones are more interesting.

Sebastian Mallaby
The Washington Post


Dear Mr. Waight,

Anybody who find the inspiration for the name of his web site in one of the most hilarious skits Monty Python ever did is okay in my book. But shouldn't it be "Lying ABOUT in ponds?" (My own all-time favorite MP bit, not that you asked, is "The Architect," in which a guy hired to design a block of flats shows up with plans for a slaughterhouse.)

To answer your question, I consider myself an independent observer of generally conservative/libertarian leanings. On matters of American politics, that tilts me toward Republicans more often than Democrats, but I have never hesitated to criticize Republican politicians or administrations when I thought they deserved it. I have likewise not hesitated to sing the praises of a Democrat, when it seemed appropriate to do so.

I don't think very many American commentators would describe their job in partisan terms, but every survey of the US media that inquires specifically into partisan loyalties shows a lopsided tilt toward liberal Democrats. My own experience during 16 years as an opinion journalist is that the great majority of writers and editors in the newsroom generally vote Democratic. That lack of ideological and political diversity doesn't matter so much on the opinion pages (where I write), but it is a big problem on the news pages

Thanks for giving me a chance to spout off. Now I'm going to go see if any moistened bints are lobbing scimitars today.

All the best,

Jeff Jacoby
Op-Ed columnist
The Boston Globe


Thanks for your note, Ken, I view myself not as a "political columnist," but "social commentator" who inevitably finds things worth discussing in the political realm. I'll take your first (of 3) choices. I am an independent who leans to the left but my world view cannot easily be described by one word like liberal or conservative. I have voted for Republicans, for example, who were willing to meet me halfway on important issues. Those who view Liberals and Conservatives as two gangs, always in a fight like Crips and Bloods, complain that I am not dependably on their side. That's their problem, poor devils.
Cheers,
CP



Lines in yellow indicate a substantive crossover column, meaning that the column is of opposite sign to the pundit's Normalized Total PI for the season, and contains at least five non-neutral partisan references.
Lines in gray indicate that the pundit has been classified as inactive, meaning that their columns are not currently being evaluated for partisanship.
Democratic references in blue, Republican in red, positive references in bold, negative in italics.
Author/
Affiliation
Title/
Date
words PI Partisan References
WP Lead Editorial
Washington Post
A Vote That Matters
19 April 2004
653 100 2D+
TOMORROW THE: Anthony A. Williams, Williams
Brendan Miniter
WSJ OpinionJournal
In Iraq, John Kerry wants to take the easy way out.
19 April 2004
843 59 2D+,6D-,1D=,7R+,1R-
In Iraq,: John Kerry
"We choose: John F. Kennedy
With every: John Forbes Kerry, JFK
It is: Kerry
This sentiment: Kerry, President Bush, Kerry
Mr. Kerry: Kerry, Reagan, President Bush, Bush
This is: Kerry, Bush, The president, Bush
This, of: Bush
William Safire
New York Times
Scandal With No Friends
19 April 2004
800 50 1D+,3R+
Senate Foreign: Dick Lugar
Senator Joe: Joe Biden
But such: Lugar
Lawyers and: Christopher Shays
NYT Lead Editorial
New York Times
The Court and Guantánamo
19 April 2004
549 50 1R-,1R=
The Supreme: Bush administration
The administration: administration
Sebastian Mallaby
Washington Post
Visions of U.S. Aid
19 April 2004
958 40 4R+,6R=
George W.: George W. Bush, Bush
The best: Bush
In the: Bush, the president
What of: Bush, the president, Bush
All rich: Bush
"My job: Bush
William Raspberry
Washington Post
We Didn't Dare Wait
19 April 2004
821 33 2R+,1R-
What follows: the president
These are: president, president
OJ On the Editorial Page
WSJ OpinionJournal
Volcker's U.N. Cleanup
19 April 2004
649 33 1D-,1D=,1R=
Only last: Congressional Democrats
All of: George Bush, John Kerry
Cal Thomas
Tribune Media Services
Sharon's big gamble
19 April 2004
831 20 3D-,1R-,6R=
By deciding: President Bush
On paper,: the president, the president
In 1956,: President Dwight Eisenhower, President Lyndon Johnson
In 1970,: President Richard Nixon
In 1996: President Bill Clinton
In 2000,: Clinton
Now, President: President George W. Bush
"Jihad is: Bush
John Fund
Inactive
Less Is More
19 April 2004
1559
Bob Herbert
Inactive
The Wrong War
19 April 2004
846