lying in ponds
The absurdity of partisanship
Home | About | Philosophy | Methods | Contact | FAQ | 2002 | 2003

Pundit Boxscore for Tuesday 23 March 2004

Following is the second of a special five part series discussing the work of New York Times columnist Paul Krugman. One part will be posted on each day of this week.

HOW COMMON ARE CROSSOVER COLUMNS? At the bottom of today's post is a table which lists the Lying in Ponds pundits with the fewest crossover columns in 2003. Clearly, crossover columns are relatively commonplace. Even pundits who are frequently criticized as partisans write some -- George Will and Maureen Dowd had ten each. Cal Thomas wrote a column entitled "The embarrassing GOP". Even columnists who have been fixtures in the Lying in Ponds Top Ten over the last two years such as Michael Kinsley and the late Robert Bartley had two each. Anyone can do it.

Only four columnists failed to cross over a single time last year: Ann Coulter, Molly Ivins, Paul Krugman and Robert Scheer. Let's look at the records of each of the four. I have evaluated two years of Ann Coulter columns so far. She did have two crossover columns in 2002, but they were both directed at Norman Mineta in his role as the Bush Administration Transportation Secretary. Of course Mr. Mineta is actually a Democrat, so those columns qualify as crossovers only on a technicality. Ms. Coulter has been even more one-sided in her commentary than Mr. Krugman over the past two years and her "irrational rhetoric and pervasive factual errors and deceptions" and desire for the death of her political opponents puts her in a league entirely of her own.

I have only one year of data on Molly Ivins and Robert Scheer. Both were very consistently partisan last year, although Mr. Scheer came close to crossing over with a column criticizing California Attorney General Bill Lockyer. It's not very difficult to find evidence that Mr. Scheer can criticize his own party if you browse back through his archives for a couple of years. He defended Arnold Schwarzenegger against Gray Davis and criticized Gary Condit in 2001, and in 2000 wrote a column entitled "Al Gore, gutless wonder". Similarly, clicking back through Molly Ivin's archives yields at least one column where she praises Republicans and criticizes Democrats over the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill.

That brings us back to Paul Krugman, who has placed 400 columns on the Op-Ed page of The New York Times going back to the beginning of 2000, yet has never written a substantive column criticizing Gray Davis, Gary Condit, Al Gore or any other Democrat. Lying in Ponds has the statistics for his columns in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, and the entire set of columns are available online at The Unofficial Paul Krugman Archive. Of course Mr. Krugman has occasionally criticized Democrats in his columns, but it's usually done tactically in the context of much sharper criticism of Republicans. An example of an almost-crossover was a September 2000 column with the promising title "Gore's Tax Problems". The column does contain substantive criticism of the Gore-Lieberman economic plan, but in the end, Mr. Krugman judged the plan as "merely uninspiring" when compared to George W. Bush's "grossly irresponsible" tax plan. Relative to the rest of Mr. Krugman's NYT canon, that column qualifies as harsh treatment of Democrats. The point is not whether his views on that subject were valid, but rather that Mr. Krugman has simply been utterly unwilling to offer undiluted criticism of any Democrat, on any subject, for a span of 400 columns.

Tomorrow: Part 3: What's Wrong with Criticizing Republicans?

Fewest 2003 Crossover Columns

Ann Coulter0
Molly Ivins0
Paul Krugman0
Robert Scheer0
Walter Williams1
Robert Bartley2
Mona Charen2
Daniel Henninger2
Michael Kinsley2
Thomas Sowell2
Charles Krauthammer3
Brendan Miniter3
William Raspberry3
Linda Chavez4
David Brooks5
E.J. Dionne5
Jeff Jacoby6
William Safire6
Cal Thomas6
Robert Samuelson7
Maureen Dowd10
George Will10
Thomas Oliphant14
Clarence Page16
Richard Cohen19
David Broder36



Lines in yellow indicate a substantive crossover column, meaning that the column is of opposite sign to the pundit's Normalized Total PI for the season, and contains at least five non-neutral partisan references.
Lines in gray indicate that the pundit has been classified as inactive, meaning that their columns are not currently being evaluated for partisanship.
Democratic references in blue, Republican in red, positive references in bold, negative in italics.
Author/
Affiliation
Title/
Date
words PI Partisan References
Paul Krugman
New York Times
Lifting the Shroud
23 March 2004
914 88 1D+,22R-,3R=
From the: Bush administration, administration, Ari Fleischer, administration
It's important,: Bush administration, White House, administration
The latest: George Bush
On "60: Bush, Dick Cheney, administration, Scott McClellan
Of course,: Bush
Did the: Bush administration, John Ashcroft
Did the: administration, White House, Bush, John Kerry
Oh, and: administration, the president, Bush
Finally, did: administration
Still, the: administration, Bush, Bush administration
Richard Cohen
Washington Post
Bush, Clarke and A Shred of Doubt
23 March 2004
1013 84 5D+,1D=,2R+,33R-,2R=
Bush, Clarke: Bush
Pity poor: George Bush, White House, the president, White House, the president, Bush
As with: Paul O'Neill, Bush White House, administration, Condoleezza Rice, Bush, Bill Clinton
This is: Bush administration, White House, Bush, the president, the president
"But Mr.: Mr. President, The president
Rice's real: Rice, Bush, Republican, Clinton administration
A similar: Vice President Cheney, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Clinton administration
Libby has: Libby, Clinton administration, Clinton administration, Bush administration, Clinton, Bush, the president
Instead, he: administration, O'Neill, administration, Paul D. Wolfowitz
The White: White House, O'Neill, White House, White House, president
Robert Scheer
Creators Syndicate
Blowing a whistle on Bush's 9/11 failures
23 March 2004
863 76 2D+,2R+,22R-,3R=
Blowing a: Bush
03.23.04 -: President Bush, administration, Ronald Reagan, White House
"Frankly, I: the president
Clarke's critique: Bush
And just: Bush, administration
Knowing this,: administration, John Kerry, the president, Bush, administration
The appalling: Bush, Paul O'Neill, Bush, Cabinet, administration, Bush, Clinton, Bush
"We had: the president, Condoleezza Rice
After more: The president, George Bush, Mr. President
That report,: the president
If what: president
E. J. Dionne Jr.
Washington Post
Why Scalia Should Duck Out
23 March 2004
957 75 1D+,14R-,5R=
FORT LAUDERDALE,: Vice President Cheney, President Bush
Let me: administration, Bush, Cheney, Bush, Gore
But forget: Cheney
The 21-page: Vice President Cheney, vice president, Ford administration
"The answer: vice president, vice president
And now: Cheney, vice president, Cheney, Cheney
This is: Bush, Cheney
A fierce: administration
Molly Ivins
Creators Syndicate
Bomb Mexico!
23 March 2004
966 69 2D+,3D=,9R-,2R=
03.23.04 -: President Bush
We did?: Sarbanes
I notice: White House, Bush
The people: George W. Bush, Bushies, John Kerry, Bush, Kerry
A weekend's: administration
Then there's: Clinton, Bush, Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld
Clarke said: Franklin Roosevelt
Another Clarke: Bush
NYT Lead Editorial
New York Times
Debating 9/11
23 March 2004
545 33 1D+,2D-,1D=,7R-,7R=
Richard Clarke: Bush, Clinton, the president, Donald Rumsfeld
Mr. Clarke: Clinton administration, Bush, Bush, Democratic administration, Clinton White House
Since the: President Bush
Richard Clarke: Ronald Reagan, administration, the president, administration
The most: administration, Bush, Bush, the president
Brendan Miniter
WSJ OpinionJournal
John F. Who?
23 March 2004
895 28 4D+,12D-,12D=,3R+,1R-,4R=
Kerry's easy: Kerry
When John: John Kerry, Kerry, Kerry
We all: Howard Dean, Ronald Reagan, Vice President Bush, Bill Clinton, Clinton, Democrat
This is: Kerry, Clinton, Republicans, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Clinton, Republicans, Clinton, the Clintons
George W.: George W. Bush, Kerry, Democratic National Committee, Terry McAuliffe, Democratic, Kerry, John Edwards, Kerry
Instead, Mr.: Kerry, Bush, Democrats, Bush
The first: Kerry, Democratic, Bush, Kerry
Welcome to: Kerry
Thomas Oliphant
Boston Globe
Wooing the 'army' of the ambivalent
23 March 2004
927 11 1D=,2R+,1R-,5R=
Attempting to: President Bush
At the: Bush, Democrats, Bush
That support: Colin Powell
A great: Bush
The reason: Bush
The irony: Bush
By this: Bush
Cal Thomas
Tribune Media Services
Living and dying by the sword
23 March 2004
764 0 1R+,1R-,1R=
The Bush: Bush administration, White House, Scott McClellan
David Brooks
New York Times
One Nation, Enriched by Biblical Wisdom
23 March 2004
758 0
David Ignatius
Inactive
Machiavelli in the Middle East
23 March 2004
837
Thomas Sowell
Creators Syndicate
Outsourcing foreign policy
23 March 2004
765 0
WP Lead Editorial
Washington Post
Mr. Sharon's Solution
23 March 2004
661 0 7R=
Mr. Sharon: Bush administration, President Bush, administration, administration, Condoleezza Rice, White House, Bush
OJ On the Editorial Page
WSJ OpinionJournal
The Fear Factor
23 March 2004
1169 0