SPINSANITY ON COULTER, SCHEER: In a complex critique of both sides in the ongoing debate over weapons of mass destruction and and the justification for the war in Iraq, Ben Fritz of Spinsanity chastises the top two members of the Lying in Ponds Top Ten. First, he goes after Ann Coulter for impugning the motives of her political opponents:
Some conservatives, meanwhile, have made equally baseless accusations that ignore the real concerns of liberal critics, instead merely accusing them of bad motives. "It's transparently political," said Sean Hannity on the Fox News show "Hannity and Colmes" on June 5. "This is a political witch-hunt. Because they're on the wrong side of history." Columnist Ann Coulter also chimed in with the accusation that, "Seething with rage and frustration at the success of the war in Iraq, liberals have started in with their female taunting about weapons of mass destruction."
Mr. Fritz also criticizes both Robert Scheer and "inactive" Lying in Ponds pundit Robert Kagan for hiding the complexity of the issue by quoting only selective portions of a government report:
A recent column by Robert Scheer is a typical example of these sorts of liberal criticisms. He correctly points out that President Bush cited the aforementioned Niger uranium story (which turned out to be based on forged documents) and that that the administration has often implied a connection between Iraq and September 11 that has not been demonstrated. He also points to recent revelations about a Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document from last September. He quotes part of it that reads, "there is no reliable information on whether Iraq is producing and stockpiling chemical weapons, or whether Iraq has - or will - establish its chemical warfare agent production facilities." He contrasts that with more definitive statements made at the time by administration officials to conclude that the President and his aides have been deceptive.That DIA report, however, is a perfect example of how both sides in this debate have managed to avoid each other's claims. Robert Kagan also cited it earlier this month in a Washington Post op-ed defending the administration against charges of deception. Kagan simply quotes a different part than Sheer does, which reads, "Iraq probably possesses chemical agent in chemical munitions" and "probably possesses bulk chemical stockpiles, primarily containing precursors, but that also could consist of some mustard agent and VX." Both Kagan and Scheer are using real evidence, but by only pointing to the portions that back up their case, they present simplistic cases to the public that ignore the complexities of the actual document.
Author/
AffiliationTitle/
Datewords PI Partisan References Clarence Page
Chicago TribuneO'Connor splits the difference
25 June 2003850 100 1R+: Richard Nixon Maureen Dowd
New York TimesCould Thomas Be Right?
25 June 2003838 64 1D-: Bob Kerrey
8R-: Republicans, Bush, G.O.P. , Bob Dole, President Bush, Bush, Gonzales, President Bush
1D=, 1R=David S. Broder
Washington PostHow to Head Off a Fight Over the High Court
25 June 20031058 20 10D+: Democratic, Patrick Leahy, Democrat, Leahy, Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, Clinton, Clinton, Leahy, Leahy, Leahy
6D-: Daschle, Leahy, Democratic, John Kerry, Joseph Lieberman, Democratic
14R+: Alberto Gonzales, Republicans, Bush, Senate Republican, Orrin Hatch, Hatch, Hatch, Hatch, Bush, Hatch, the president, Hatch, Gonzales, Fleischer
1R-: Ari Fleischer
6D=, 9R=Claudia Rosett
InactiveTwo Refugee Stories
25 June 20031949 0 27R= Cal Thomas
Tribune Media ServicesNegative action at the Supreme Court
25 June 2003754 0 Linda Chavez
Creators SyndicateIn Michigan case, the real losers were the American people
25 June 2003738 0 Anne Applebaum
InactiveBumbling Bipartisanship
25 June 2003815 0 3D=, 5R= Michael Kinsley
Washington PostWant Diversity? Think Fuzzy
25 June 20031044 0 Thomas L. Friedman
InactiveBad Planning
25 June 2003888 0 8R= Walter Williams
Creators SyndicateHow much we tolerate
25 June 2003701 0