lying in ponds
The absurdity of partisanship
Home | About | Philosophy | Methodology | Contact

Pundit Boxscore for Tuesday 15 October 2002

NYT vs. WSJ: Reader Michael Kurtz responds to last Thursday's comment about the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal:

Since you leave out the WSJ's pet liberal, Al Hunt, it seems disingenuous for you to suggest that because the NYT has a pet conservative it is less biased than the WSJ. In any event the bias charge against the NYT is because of its NEWS writing, not because of its OPINION writing. I have not heard this charge recently against either the WSJ or the WP.

The Al Hunt issue has come up several times. When I chose which columnists to include at the beginning of the year, my approach was to accept each paper's definition of their own political columnists, by evaluating all of the pundits they list on each of their three editorial page web pages. I'm not including Al Hunt at the WSJ (or some others) because they're not on that WSJ page, not because of any judgement on my part.

Then Mr. Kurtz followed up by making clear the difference between the Wall Street Journal and the OpinionJournal.com web page:

I don't want to get into a semantic argument, but you are wrong about the WSJ's "definition of their own political columnists." Al Hunt's column is in exactly the same position in the paper as Robert Bartley's. What is different about Al Hunt is that his column is not given away for free on the OpinionJournal.com web site. Also you include Peggy Noonan, but her column is normally NOT included in the paper version of the WSJ, but only appears in OpinionJournal.com.

OpinionJournal.com is not the WSJ, and what you are measuring is OpinionJournal.com, minus the weblogger James Taranto. OpinionJournal.com probably represents well the opinions of the editorial board of the WSJ, but it is much to the right of the actual opinion pages of the WSJ.

I think Mr. Kurtz is exactly right. He's right that Mickey Kaus and others constantly criticize the NYT for bias, but focus mostly on news stories rather than editorials. My point was that the WSJ's set of regular columnists is less politically diverse than that of the NYT, but he correctly makes a distinction between the OpinionJournal.com web site and the actual WSJ. Since there's no way I will pay for a $79 annual subscription to the online WSJ just to get Al Hunt's column, I guess I should adjust my terminology to refer to OpinionJournal.com instead of the WSJ.

WELL, AT LEAST I HAVE MORE FREE TIME: Now that my beloved St. Louis Cardinals are not in the World Series, I won't have any problem tearing myself away from the TV to do other things.



Author/
Affiliation
Title/
Date
words PI Partisan References
Paul Krugman
New York Times
Still Living Dangerously
15 October 2002
856 100 5R-: administration, administration, administration, Richard Perle, administration
Thomas J. Bray
Wall Street Journal
GOP: Covering the Spread
15 October 2002
1317 50 2D+: Democratic, Democratic
12D-: Democratic, Democrats, Democrats, Democrats, Democrats, Carl Levin, Levin, Democratic, Democrats, Democrats, Al Gore, Bill Clinton
11R+: GOP, President Bush, Republicans, Republicans, President Bush, Bush, Republicans, Bush, Republicans, Republicans, George W. Bush
2R-: President Bush, Bush administration
1D=, 10R=
E. J. Dionne Jr.
Washington Post
Are Moderate Republicans Obsolete?
15 October 2002
1170 38 14D+: Chris Van Hollen, Democrat, Democratic, Van Hollen, Van Hollen, Democrats, Democrats, Democrat, Van Hollen, Van Hollen, Democrats, Democratic, Sumers, Democrat
1D-: Democratic
10R+: Morella, Morella, Morella, Morella, Republicans, Morella, Connie Morella, Roukema, Ronald Reagan, Morella
24R-: Republicans, Connie Morella, Republican, Republican, Morella, Morella, Republican, Republicans, Gingrich, Morella, Morella, Bush, Morella, Republican, Tom DeLay, Republican, DeLay, Republican Party, Roukema, Republican, Garrett, Republican Party, Republicans, Republican
4D=, 18R=
Richard Cohen
Washington Post
Nobel Winners And Losers
15 October 2002
964 17 10D+: Carter, Carter, Carter, Carter, Carter, Carter, Carter, Carter, Carter, Carter
7R+: George W. Bush, Bush, Bush, Bush, Bush, Bush, Bush
1R-: Henry Kissinger
3D=, 2R=
Nicholas D. Kristof
New York Times
Saddam, the U.S. Agent
15 October 2002
842 0