lying in ponds
The absurdity of partisanship
Home | About | Philosophy | Methods | Contact | FAQ | 2002 | 2003

Pundit Boxscore for Tuesday 17 February 2004

ON THE ROAD: I'll be leaving early Wednesday morning on a business trip to upstate New York, so Wednesday's columns will be late. Hopefully I can at least evaluate columns on a delayed schedule for the rest of the week. In the meantime, check out Dean Esmay on partisanship.

A SMALL RASPBERRY SAMPLE: An examination of the partisanship rankings this early in the year plainly illustrates the effect of small sample size. Because of only a few consecutive Democratic-leaning columns, Washington Post columnist William Raspberry has moved into the Top Ten, even though he is clearly one of the least partisan pundits. Mr. Raspberry had only the 27th highest partisan score out of 33 columnists in 2003, and was 26th of 37 in 2002. He'll soon drop off this year's list, to be replaced by more reliably partisan colleagues.

Mr. Raspberry has long been one of my favorites, because he has always been willing to grapple honestly with difficult issues, addressing arguments on all sides without arrogance or vitriol. A couple of years ago I highlighted an excerpt from his commencement address here at NC State:

Yet we seldom take the effort to recruit allies from among those who hold views different from our own. Conservatives are (to liberals) people who don't care about minorities, or women, or "the little people," not decent men and women who have a different view of what works. Liberals are (to conservatives) people who want only to tax and spend the country into bankruptcy, not thoughtful men and women who want America to work for everyone. Each sees the other as enemy.

Surprisingly often, I have discovered, a focus on the problem, rather than on political enemies, could disclose common interests and lead to innovative solutions.



Lines in yellow indicate a substantive crossover column, meaning that the column is of opposite sign to the pundit's Normalized Total PI for the season, and contains at least five non-neutral partisan references.
Lines in gray indicate that the pundit has been classified as inactive, meaning that their columns are not currently being evaluated for partisanship.
Democratic references in blue, Republican in red, positive references in bold, negative in italics.
Author/
Affiliation
Title/
Date
words PI Partisan References
OJ On the Editorial Page
WSJ OpinionJournal
Abdul Qadeer Khan
17 February 2004
850 100 1R-
PARIS--We observed: administration
Brendan Miniter
WSJ OpinionJournal
What Bush learned from Lincoln.
17 February 2004
1246 91 1D-,9R+,1R=
What Bush: Bush
Terrorism is,: George W. Bush
President Bush: President Bush, Bush, Bush
Teaching civics,: President Bush, administration
However, the: President Bush, Bush
This election: John Kerry, Bush
Robert Scheer
Creators Syndicate
Old MacDonald had a judge ...
17 February 2004
822 85 1R+,12R-
Quack, quack.: vice president
Bizarre as: Vice President Dick Cheney
But Scalia's: White House, Cheney
"It did: Dick Cheney
The case: Cheney, Cheney, the president
This all: Cheney, GOP
After all,: president
"I'm surprised: vice president
The Scalia-Cheney: Cheney
NYT Lead Editorial
New York Times
Distorting the Intelligence
17 February 2004
898 61 2D+,2R+,11R-,3R=
The Senate: administration, the president
In making: administration, administration
Nuclear The president: The president, Bush, President Bush, the president
Biological The National: President Bush
Aerial Attacks Some: Vice President Dick Cheney, Trent Lott, Republican, Cheney, Bill Nelson, Democrat, Cheney
The common: Bush administration, administration
Paul Krugman
New York Times
The Health of Nations
17 February 2004
821 60 1D+,1D-,3R-
The Economic: Democrats
According to: the president
But the: administration
I'll talk: administration, Democrat
Thomas Oliphant
Boston Globe
Kerry, Edwards win on their ideas
17 February 2004
966 58 13D+,2D-,3D=,1R=
Kerry, Edwards: Kerry, Edwards
WASHINGTON IT: Democrats, Democrats, John Kerry, John Edwards
Each had: President Bush
For Kerry: Kerry, Edwards
As the: Kerry, Edwards
As the: Democrats, Joe Lieberman, Howard Dean, Dick Gephardt
Among other: Edwards, Edwards
Kerry's special: Kerry
So-called catastrophic: Kerry
Molly Ivins
Creators Syndicate
And they're off!
17 February 2004
994 57 14D+,4D-,2D=,7R-,3R=
My favorite: Democratic, the President, RNC, Ed Gillespie, Democrats
In the: John Kerry, Kerry, Democratic
Happily for: Kerry, Republicans, President Bush, John Kerry, Bush, Kerry
In another: Al Sharpton, Republican, Sharpton, Sharpton
Stone has: Republican, Sharpton, Republicans
But for: Max Cleland, Bush administration, Cleland, Cleland
He also: Cleland
As for: Cleland, Cleland, Cleland
How lucky: Cleland
E. J. Dionne Jr.
Washington Post
Kerry's Primary Education
17 February 2004
1030 49 19D+,4D-,13D=,11R-,6R=
Kerry's Primary: Kerry
MILWAUKEE --: Democrats, Bush
Face it,: Democrats, Howard Dean, John Kerry, John Edwards
Kerry ran: Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Edwards, Dean, Kerry, Dean
Then the: Democrats, George W. Bush, Kerry, Kerry, Kerry
But if: Bush
Some of: Bush, Bush, administration, Bush, Republicans
And then: the president, Democrats, Kerry
In the: Bush, Democrats, Democrats, administration, White House, Bush, Bush
The political: Bush, Democrats, Jim Doyle, Democratic, Democratic, Doyle, the president, Republicans, Democratic
Also, count: Democrats, Edwards, Edwards
Kerry wants: Kerry, Kerry, Kerry
In Sunday's: Kerry, Edwards
Kerry needs: Kerry
Richard Cohen
Washington Post
Bush's War Against Nuance
17 February 2004
937 48 2D-,1D=,13R-,7R=
Bush's War: Bush
To satisfy: Joseph R. Biden, George Bush, the president, the president
At one: Clintonian
No one: Bush administration, the president, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell
But a: Bush
After Bush's: Bush, Wes Clark, Bush
Others lamented: Bush, Bush
Bush, though,: Bush
There is: the president, Bush
"He had: the president
The president: The president, Bush
WP Lead Editorial
Washington Post
Pricing Drugs
17 February 2004
687 33 1D+,2D=
WITH THE: Nancy Pelosi, Thomas A. Daschle
Nevertheless, before: John Breaux
Cal Thomas
Tribune Media Services
The National Guard (again)
17 February 2004
843 16 3D+,3D-,7D=,4R+,8R=
Didn't we: Dan Quayle, George H.W. Bush, Quayle, Quayle, Quayle
Many of: President Bush, Quayle
Could we: John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Walter Mondale, George McGovern, Charles Rangel, Barney Frank, Al Gore
Would this: Democrats, Bill Clinton, President Bush, President Bush, Clinton
President Bush: President Bush, Franklin D. Roosevelt
This isn't: administration
This is: Bush, John Kerry
David Brooks
New York Times
The Party of Kennedy, or Carter?
17 February 2004
930 15 14D+,14D-,6D=,6R+,1R=
The Party: Kennedy, Carter
Between 1940: Democratic Party, George Bush, John Kerry
The Democrats: Democrats, Harry Truman, John Kennedy
Their confidence: Scoop Jackson, Democrats, Republicans
But most: Democrats, John Kerry
These Democrats: Democrats
Hence Democratic: Democratic, Democrats, Jimmy Carter
These liberals: Democrats, Ronald Reagan, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Reaganites, Truman, Kennedy, Democratic, Kerry, Reagan
Most Americans: Reagan, Democrats
But the: Democrats, Democrats, Democrats
Now, in: Democratic Party, Truman, Kennedy
If you: Democratic, Democratic, Jimmy Carter
And if: John Kerry
If Kerry: Kerry, Truman, Kennedy
Thomas Sowell
Creators Syndicate
The equality dogma
17 February 2004
745 0
David Ignatius
Inactive
The Right Tools To Fight Terror
17 February 2004
873